Skip to content

· In Libya, the US military asks itself some questions.

.
THE MYTH THAT SOLDIERS never question orders is a dangerous one. In fact, their questions are the questions that most deserve careful answers.

By KAREN WALKER [Armed Forces Journal] – A hesitant president, a skeptical SecDef and a cautious Air Force chief of staff made a curious trio of warmongers in the days leading up to the United Nations Security Council resolution that authorized “all necessary measures” to protect civilians in Libya, paving the way for a coalition force to start airstrikes March 19…

Given the seeming half-hearted U.S. participation — which nevertheless was primarily responsible for delivering the bombardment’s first waves of heavy fire — the big questions about where Security Council Resolution 1973 could take the U.S. are:

1. What’s the military objective, and was this use of force the last resort?

2. What makes this civil war different from others in which the U.S. has no vital national security interest?

3. Did Obama get bullied into military action for which the U.S. ultimately will end up carrying the can?

4. What is the true level of support for this action by the Arab League, and why is Libya different from Bahrain and Yemen?

5. Is it disingenuous to believe the world can’t handle its small fights without the aid of the U.S.?

6. Is Obama’s caution against declaring U.S. leadership a sign of his reluctance to be the decision-maker or a ploy to ensure this doesn’t look like Iraq circa 2003?

Continued at Armed Forces Journal | More Chronicle & Notices.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x