Skip to content

Schoolbook battles: Education publishers and their little-read books triumph.

By TIM CARMODY [Wired] – Education publishers dwarf trade presses. Only the top trade press, Random House (itself owned by Bertelsmann) is bigger than Cengage, the little-known education publishing division that Thomson spun off in 2008 before merging with Reuters.

Education publishers are also much bigger than other media companies that attract much more attention. Pearson is far bigger than AOL or The New York Times Company (and much more profitable). In order to find publishers with greater revenue or profits, you have to go up the ladder to companies like News Corp that include global television markets, or retail entities, like Amazon. This makes companies like Pearson too big to ignore, especially when they’re willing to partner up. Continue reading “Schoolbook battles: Education publishers and their little-read books triumph.” »

Finally, a word in opposition to a belief in trout-turkeys.

By CARRIE FIGDOR [an introduction to an audio interview at New Books in Philosophy] – It might be a surprise to non-metaphysicians to discover the extent to which it is questionable whether the familiar objects we see and interact with – the dogs, trees, iPods, and so on – really exist. And yet, these familiar objects are actually very strange. For example, we take for granted that very same object can change all of its properties, and all of its matter, and yet somehow remain the same object. but how can that be? By analogy, if I swap all the ingredients in a recipe with a bunch of other ingredients, and then change all the steps, would it make sense to say that I’ve followed the recipe? But if it doesn’t make sense, then what should we say about the nature of ordinary objects? Continue reading “Finally, a word in opposition to a belief in trout-turkeys.” »

‘Expanding the idea of beauty’ without going all the way to BBW.

By RACHEL SHTEIR [Chronicle of Higher Education] – I’m all for expanding the idea of beauty, so long as it means that I can read fewer sentences that begin with the words “according to sociological studies” and more Chekhov. For while Freud wrote compellingly of the pleasure people take in looking at beauty, there is no modern writer who untangles its comic and disastrous effects better than the playwright. His Uncle Vanya revolves around the beautiful, idle, unhappy Yelena, who transfixes all the characters, including Vanya, whose dacha she is visiting. At the end of the drama, Sonya, the unattractive daughter of a rich old bore, an academic in fact, who is married to Yelena, longs for a beautiful afterlife. The unbeautiful girl dreams of beauty, while the beautiful girl seems to mourn her inability to feel. Continue reading “‘Expanding the idea of beauty’ without going all the way to BBW.” »

A new sign above the eurozone: ‘This way out’.

By ROBERT BARRO [Wall Street Journal] – The EU specifies with great detail how candidate countries can qualify for euro membership, but it offers no recipe for exit or expulsion. A natural possibility would be to start by throwing out the least qualified members, based on lack of fiscal discipline or other economic criteria. Greece is an obvious candidate—it has been increasingly out of control fiscally since the 1970s. But instead of expulsion, the EU reaction has been to provide a sufficient bailout to deter the country from leaving. Continue reading “A new sign above the eurozone: ‘This way out’.” »

Bureaucratic overgrazing and the tragedy of the common currency.

By GARY D. LIBECAP [Defining Ideas] – In 1968, the American ecologist Garrett Hardin wrote “The Tragedy of the Commons” which must be the most cited article ever to appear in Science Magazine. In this article, Hardin described the “tragedy” associated with common pool resources—those that are claimed or used by many with little effective restriction. With a common resource, each party is motivated by private self-interest in deciding how much of and when to use the resource. But the costs of these private decisions are spread across to everyone. This mismatch between private and social benefits and costs in decision-making results in the outcomes we are all familiar with—waste, plundering, and extensive and rapid use of the resource with little consideration of the future. Continue reading “Bureaucratic overgrazing and the tragedy of the common currency.” »

Earth’s ‘intelligent life’ – is this as smart as it gets?

By ALAN HIRSCHFELD [Wall Street Journal] – Recent discoveries might seem to boost the likelihood of life elsewhere in the galaxy. We have confirmed the stunning ubiquity of extrasolar planets in other star systems, the latest a possible Earth-analog orbiting right in the habitable sweet spot—not too close, not too far—from its central sun. Biologists have encountered bacteria underneath a mile of Antarctic ice and nestled within rocks in a Yellowstone geyser; it’s only a modest stretch to imagine that the next generation of robotic spacecraft might find simple biota in equally hostile havens on Mars or on one of Jupiter’s moons. Continue reading “Earth’s ‘intelligent life’ – is this as smart as it gets?” »

Memphis comes to Kensington.

 By Keith Johnson.

Keith Johnson, of New York’s Urban Architecture gallery, was an early importer and collector of Memphis pieces and, with his wife, Celia Morrissette, helpful in sourcing and gifting some of the selection of objects for the V&A’s Postmodernism: Style and Subversion 1970-1990 exhibition. His notes follow:

“Murmansk” drawing / Ettore Sottsass (study).

I FIRST FOUND OUT about the V&A postmodernism exhibition through an amazing young British designer, Bethann Laura Wood. My wife Celia and I were in London in 2008 at a private party for hot Spanish designer Jaime Hayon being held in the 18th century house at 33 Portland Place,  where they filmed The King’s Speech.

We were milling around a sea of young financial hipsters (who represent the new class of collectors today). Hayon had just installed his enormous porcelain chess installation that day (The Tournament) in Trafalgar Square, and it was the talk of London. Sweet little Bethann stood out like a sore thumb in her extraordinarily colourful layers of feminine garb (imagine Boy George at the height of his popularity) – she was pretty, magnetic, oblivious to the “hipster swells” and their caustic stares. What a moment!

Celia and I approached her, engaging her in a fantastic conversation – she was the coolest person in the room, other than Jaime himself – and she quickly confided in us her love of the Memphis Milano furniture movement of the ’80’s – and with her colour sense, who could doubt her? I told her I was (and still am) the principal Memphis dealer in America, and after she stopped screaming with joy, she exclaimed, “But Keith – the V&A is doing an exhibition on Memphis and postmodernism, and I know the curators! We have to put all of you together.”

And she did, God bless her! Within weeks, Glenn Adamson, Jane Pavitt (the Chief Curators of the exhibition) and I were fast friends.

***

“Cupola” lamp / Peter Shire.

I began my firm, Urban Architecture, in September of 1981, after attending the very first Memphis Milano exhibition in Milan, Italy. I had been vacationing in Europe, deciding at my younger brother Craig’s prompting to visit Milan to see the Salone del Mobile Internazionale – the Furniture Fair! I walked into it completely accidentally!

It was not only an epiphany-like moment in my life, but Memphis’ participation in (yet outside of) the formal Salone Week was one of the most important moments in modern design – a paradigm shift, if you will. Before Memphis, there was only the International Style (Modernism) – glass, steel, neutral leather, minimal non-decorated objects. And then came Memphis. Suddenly, everyone was talking about Memphis. As Barbara Radice wrote, in Memphis: Research, Experiences, Result, Failures and Successes of New Design (Gruppo Editoriale Electa, Milano, 1984):

Memphis was born in 1981 on the initiative of Ettore Sottsass and a group of young Milanese architects and designers interested in exploring more up-to-date ways of home living and design. In three years of activity that have involved famous and unknown architects and designers from all over the world, Memphis has overturned the premises on which so-called Modern Design is based. Memphis has become an almost mythical symbol of New Design, the influence of which can now be seen in innumerable fields of production…

“Oceanic” lamp / Michele De Lucchi.

Barbara Radice’s observation came at about the same time Paul Goldberger was writing in The New York Times (on 14 October 1982:

It seemed in 1981, when reports of Memphis began to arrive from Milan, that this was to be nothing but a big put on, a kind of junk furniture design that existed to thumb its nose at bourgeois culture more than anything else. Now that the pieces have actually arrived in New York they turn out to be something else entirely, vastly more convincing as serious pieces than they appear to be in photographs.

They are absolutely wild and wonderful, but they are not nihilistic. They do not come out of a desire to tell us nothing means anything so let us forget serious ideas and just have a good time. They pieces emerge out of a careful attention to function, to materials and to practicality…in almost every case these chairs are comfortable, if visually shocking: the tables sensible, the bookshelves and chests practical…

Even furniture designer George Nelson, one of the founders of American Modernism, was moved to note (in April 1983) that “Memphis is not in any atlas. It is a state of the soul, the soul at the end of the 20th Century. If you didn’t know that the 20th Century had a soul, now you know.”

***

“Heisenberg” clock / George Sowden.

Decisions were made specifically, I was told, by committee – but mostly by the curators and the acquisitions committee.

The exhibition evolved, but it ultimately followed an extraordinary master installation plan by the exhibition architects, Kevin Carmody and Andy Groarke (of Carmody Groarke, Ltd., London), in concert with the wishes of curators Jane Pavitt and Glenn Adamson.

It was definitely organic.

Only seminal activities within the movement were considered – architecture (Robert Venturi, Denise Scott Brown, Hans Hollein, Michael Graves, Stanley Tigerman, Aldo Rossi, et al.), MTV and its ancillaries (Annie Lennox, Depeche Mode, Grace Jones, Talking Heads and David Byrne, Divo, New Order, et al.), cinema (Blade Runner), performance/music (Laurie Anderson), fashion (Commes des Garcons, Vivienne Westwood, et al.), graphics (Neville Brody, THE FACE Magazine, New Wave album covers, etc.), jewelry (Cleto Munari), design (Memphis Milano, Alchimia, Archizoom, etc.) and designers (Ettore Sottsass, Alessandro Mendini, Borek Sipek, Michael Graves, Aldo Rossi, Paolo Deganello) and on and on.

If it undermined or challenged Modernist conventions, it was in!

Compared to this, there has never been a postmodernist exhibition of any note. This was the first definitive survey – scholarly, inclusive, opinionated. Nothing before encapsulated the movement quite like this.This exhibition has (in itself) resulted in a new paradigm shift, a reassessment of old underlying postmodern assumptions and a new reassessment of current artistic activities. Ask: was Lady Gaga possible without Grace Jones and Boy George; Frank Gehry without Venturi, Sottsass, Mendini, Rossi et al?

***

“Murmansk” silver fruitbowl / Ettore Sottsass.

For the catalogue, Glenn and Jane often called upon me for quotes, clarifications, history, secrets, gossip of the day, etc. The section on the marketing of Memphis and postmodernism included an interesting paragraph about Urban Architecture, our methodology for selling these perplexing works, displaying them, finding and proselytizing new clients (especially in an unsolicited fashion). Their thoughts made a (young) old man feel young again.

My beautiful wife, Celia Morrissette, and I donated several important pieces to the exhibition and to the permanent V&A Collections. There were some fabulous Memphis table lights (Oceanic by Michele De Lucchi; Cupola by Peter Shire); a small clock (Heisenberg by George Sowden).

But particularly valuable and seminal to the entire Memphis furniture section of the exhibition was a very generous gift from Celia exclusively – the original study drawing for the Murmansk silver fruit-bowl by Ettore Sottsass (the most popular Memphis object of all!). The Museum considered this gift/acquisition to be absolutely critical to the entire display of postmodernist furniture – it clearly shows the gritty, single-minded approach to conjuring up such zeitgeist-like objects!

***

Did the exhibition reach any new conclusions about postmodernism? Hundreds. Essentially, that it was truly the fin-de-siecle style of our twentieth century, encapsulating the ancient (historical) and new (vanguard), high style and kitsch, the electronic age, rock’n’roll, plastic vs age-old craftsmanship – the true visual cacophony of our world today.

But more importantly, this stylish “fin-de-siecle” did not just pour over into the next century. This one roared into the next millennium. Who in human memory has ever experienced that?


Keith Rennie Johnson is the President and Director of Urban Architecture, Inc., in Brooklyn, NY. The gallery showcases important twentieth century visual and avant-garde decorative art. For more than 20 years, Urban Architecture has been the leading US dealer for Memphis Milano and Museo Alchimia.

Also in The Fortnightly Review: Postmodernism and history, by Anthony Howell.

More: Jonathan Glancey on Memphis in The Guardian (2001).

 

Recalling Victorian scientists and their sung verse.

By PAUL COLLINS [New Scientist] – Poetry has been a long-standing tradition in the natural sciences, and Victorian scientists, in particular, had a wide-ranging education that fostered a powerful affinity with the Muse. “Nature, under its first editor Norman Lockyer, regularly published verse,” notes Daniel Brown, a professor of English at the University of Western Australia in Perth. Many of the central scientific figures of the day would converge on various social clubs, he adds, where they would “recite and indeed sing poems they had written”.

Brown has been investigating this unique strand of English verse for his new book, The Poetry of Victorian Scientists: Style, science and nonsense, to be published next year by Cambridge University Press. It should provide a welcome contrast to the bulk of previous studies on 19th-century poetry, which had found an ambivalence to science in the work of the era’s better-known voices, while ignoring the more informed verse of those practising the disciplines. Although never as skilfully executed as the work of Tennyson and his ilk, these poems are witty, playful, and reveal much about the interests and personalities of their writers. Continue reading “Recalling Victorian scientists and their sung verse.” »

For Europe, what’s another generation or two?

By GEORGE STEINER [Telerama] – Between August 1914 and May 1945, Europe, the area that extends from Madrid to Moscow, and from Copenhagen to Palermo, lost close to 80 million human beings to wars, deportations, concentration camps, famines, and bombardments. The fact that it continued to exist is a miracle. But its resurrection was only a partial one. Continue reading “For Europe, what’s another generation or two?” »

Google doesn’t translate. It predicts.

By ROBERT McCRUM [The Observer] – Google is in the vanguard of what is becoming a revolution in the scope and technique of translation. Google’s solution to a quintessentially human problem…implements Wittgenstein: “Don’t ask for the meaning, ask for the use.” So it will search stupendous archives of translated material and uses probability to derive the likeliest meaning, based on context. To do this, Google Translate draws on a database of several trillion words, taken from a corpus of UN documentation, Harry Potter novels, press reports and inter-company memoranda.

Recently Google Translate added five tongues – Telugu, Tamil, Kannada, Bengali and Gujarati – to its iPhone app, and can now supply translations for some 63 languages. Bellos gives the most succinct explanation of its mechanics: “Translation is what you get, but translation isn’t really what Google does. It’s like the difference between engineering and knowledge. An engineering solution is to make something work, but the way you make it work doesn’t necessarily have anything to do with the underlying things. Airplanes do not work the way birds fly.” Continue reading “Google doesn’t translate. It predicts.” »

Why on earth would an infinite God bother with Incarnation?

By GEORGE WEIGEL [First Things] – Posit an all-powerful and infinite God, and most of us wouldn’t have too much trouble with the idea that such a God could do anything, including coming into the finite world he created. The real question is why such a God would want to do such a thing: to submit his divinity to the limits of our humanity, to dwindle into infancy and then to go farther—to die as a tortured criminal at the hands of his own creatures. Here is the “scandal” of Christianity. For the answer faith gives to the question of why is salvific love: a love so great that it required, not an argument, but a demonstration. Continue reading “Why on earth would an infinite God bother with Incarnation?” »

The weighty type of literature on display in New York.

By DAVID W. DUNLAP [New York Times] – Hundreds of historical punches and matrices of various typefaces and dozens of books are on view at the Grolier Club in “Printing for Kingdom, Empire & Republic: Treasures From the Archives of the Imprimerie Nationale.” (It ceased being Royale in 1789, as did everything else in France.)

This is the first time these exquisite artifacts have been shown outside France, said H. George Fletcher, a club member who is the curator of the show. Their arrival could not be more timely. Continue reading “The weighty type of literature on display in New York.” »

Scientific misconduct, 2325 times a year.

By CHARLES GROSS [The Nation] – The American Association for the Advancement of Science surveyed a random sample of its members, and 27 percent of the respondents believed they had encountered or witnessed fabricated, falsified or plagiarized research over the previous ten years, with an average of 2.5 examples. A study by the director of intramural research at the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) of the Department of Health and Human Services found that of 2,212 researchers receiving NIH grants, 201 reported instances of likely federally defined misconduct over a three-year period, of which 60 percent were fabrication or falsification and 36 percent plagiarism. Noting that in 2007 155,000 personnel received research support from the NIH, the authors suggest that under the most conservative assumptions, a minimum of 2,325 possible acts of research misconduct occur each year. Finally, in a meta-analysis of eighteen studies, 2 percent of scientists admitted to fabricating or falsifying data and more than 14 percent had observed other scientists doing the same. Continue reading “Scientific misconduct, 2325 times a year.” »

‘A reversal of the process of European financial integration.’

By STEPHEN FIDLER and DAVID ENRICH [Wall Street Journal] – The first decade of the euro intertwined the Continent’s financial systems as never before. Banks and investment funds in one euro-using country gorged on the bonds of others, freed of worry about devaluation-prone currencies like the drachma, lira, peseta and escudo.

But as the devaluation danger waned, another risk grew, almost unseen by investors: the chance that governments, no longer backed by national central banks, could default. Continue reading “‘A reversal of the process of European financial integration.’” »

Havel on Russia: ‘There can be no talk of democracy…’

by TOM JONES [Czech Position/Česká pozice] – The morning after Czech President Václav Klaus declined to comment on the post-election situation in Russia during his Russian counterpart’s visit to Prague, an appeal to Russian citizens and the country’s opposition movements by Václav Havel, the first post-communist Czech president, was published in the independent Russian newspaper Novaya gazeta.

Continue reading “Havel on Russia: ‘There can be no talk of democracy…’” »