-
About KU’s Trollope Prize.
1. John Taylor: Remembering Pierre Chappuis
2. Leslie Stephen and Victorian intellectual life by Bruce Kinzer
3. Johanna Higgins: Ghost and a half-dozen more new poems
…and much more, below in this column.
Audio archive: Hayden Carruth reads Contra Mortem and Journey to a Known Place | James Laughlin reads Easter in Pittsburgh and five more | Peter Robinson reads Manifestos for a lost cause and Dreamt Affections| Daragh Breen’s Aural Triptych
More below. Scroll down.
4. New to The Fortnightly Review? Our online series is more than ten years old! YOU MAY NEVER CATCH UP, BUT YOU CAN START HERE: Nights In and two more new poems by Anthony Howell Dreamt Affections, a sequence by Peter Robinson | Freedom and justice at the Warburg by Peter McCarey | A Brexit Fudge by Alan Macfarlane | The poem’s not in the word by C. F. Keary | Peter Riley’s Poetry Notes: An Anthology for the Apocalypse | Diderot: The Curious Materialist, by Caroline Warman | Cambridge and two more poems by Ralph Hawkins | Gerard Manley Hopkins: No Worst There Is None, by Alan Wall | Hoyt Rogers: Seeing with Words: Yves Bonnefoy and the Seicento | Dragon Rock, and two more short fictions, by Umiyuri Katsuyama, translated by Toshiya Kamei | Adorno and the Philosophy of Modern Music: Part three of the essay by Tronn Overend | Michael Buckingham Gray: Back to the drawing board, an extremely short story | Customer. Relationship. Management. A downloadable polemic by Sascha Akhtar | Strictly Scrum: Michelene Wandor on the life and work of James Haskell, flanker | Telling it for ourselves: Simon Collings on the latest cinema news from Africa | Stephen Wade on the Good Soldier and his creator: The Good Writer Hašek | Six prose poems by Scott Thurston | The Seicento and the Cult of Images by Yves Bonnefoy, and ‘Seeing with Words: Yves Bonnefoy and the Seicento,’ by Hoyt Rogers | Jonathan Gorvett, In Djibouti with The Angel of Hulme | An Aural Triptych by Daragh Breen | Immanuel Kant and the origin of the dialectic, the second part of Tronn Overend’s essay on Adorno and music | Three bilinguacultural poems by Changming Yuan | The Optician, short fiction by Cecilia Eudave | (a bean) — fiction by Marzia D’Amico | Stories from The Jazz Age by Aidan Semmens | ‘The London Cage’ and three more poems, by Judith Willson | Manifestos for a lost cause: A sequence of poems by Peter Robinson | Seven new poems by Barry Schwabsky | The poetry of social commitment: Poetry Notes by Peter Riley | The poet as essayist, by Alan Wall | On Gathering and Togethering in Medellin by Richard Berengarten | Two songs by Tristram Fane Saunders | What Heroism Feels Like: Fiction by Benjamin Wolfe | Two poems: ‘Inbound’ and one untitled about Ziggy by Nigel Wheale | Iconoclasm and portraiture in recent fiction by Paul Cohen | The Weimar Republic and critical theory: Adorno on modern music. First in a series by Tronn Overend | From the archive: Art, constantly aspiring: The School of Giorgione by Walter Pater | Seven very, very short fictions by Tom Jenks | The Seicento and the Cult of Images by Yves Bonnefoy | Three poems after reading Heine by Tom Lowenstein | Six new poems byJohanna Higgins | Macanese Concrete by Peter McCarey | ‘Leave-taking’, the end of a left-bank affair. By Ian Seed | Peter Riley probes Laura Riding’s many modes and offers his 2020 list of summer reviews |Bibliographic Archæology in Cairo by Raphael Rubinstein | Steve Xerri: Ezra Pound’s life in verse — with two more new poems, one featuring Keats | New Poems by Carrie Etter and Anna Forbes | ‘So, Dreams’ and three more poems, by Luke Emmett | Simon Collings wanders Buñuel’s labyrinth of artifice | Matt Hanson on the Romaniotes in America | For Once, a short fiction by Susana Martín Gijón | Four prose poems by Jane Monson | Jesse Glass and the poetry of ‘ouch’, explained: Pain… | Three poems, one very prose-like, by Claire Crowther | Two new poems by Sandra Kolankiewicz | Michelene Wandor reviews a metro-anthology from London’s twin cities | Simon Collings interviews Jeremy Noel-Tod, anthologist of prose poetry | Alan Wall: How we see now. A Note on Inscape, Descriptionism and Logical Form | Simon Perril: Poems from ‘the Slip’ | Michael Blackburn reviews Byatt’s Odd Angel | Christopher Landrum looks through Chris Arnade’s candid camera at America | Nigel Wheale reviews Ian Crockatt’s translations of the Skaldic verse of Orkney | Osip Mandelstam’s Tristia, in a new translation by Peter McCarey | Anna de Noailles: Thirteen poems in versions by Anthony Howell | Meandering through the Belle-Époque with Anthony Howell | Peter Riley‘s Poetry Notes for Summer 2020 | Three collections of prose poetry: 1.Nine haibun by Sheila E. Murphy | 2.Hurt Detail and two more prose poems by Lydia Unsworth | 3.Ten prose poems, five about men. By Mark Russell | The Latest Event in the History of the Novel by Paul Cohen | Life after life: Viduities, an essay by Alan Wall | As Grass Will Amend (Intend) Its Surfaces, by landscape poet Peter Larkin | More delicate, if minor, interconnections. Poetry by Tom Lowenstein | What Peter Knobler discovered out Walking While White in New York City | Alan Wall reviews Ian Sansom’s autopsy of Auden’s September 1, 1939 | A few very short fictions by Georgia Wetherall | A Play — for 26 Voices by Alice Notley | Four new poems from Credo, Stephen Wiest‘s new collection | Nigel Wheale on the significance and frailty of Raymond Crump | Ottomania! Matt Hanson reports on three new Turkish titles | Cinema: Simon Collings looks into Andrew Kötting’s Whalebone Box | Gowersby. A new puzzle-fiction by Shukburgh Ashby | The Jinn of Failaka: Reportage byMartin Rosenstock | Five Hung Particles by Iain Britton | Three poems from ‘Sovetica’ by Caroline Clark | It’s about time—Boustrophedon time: Anthony Howell is Against Pound | When words fail: Alan Wall diagnoses Shakespeare’s Dysnarrativia | Olive Custance, Lord Alfred Douglas’s much, much better half. By Ferdi McDermott | Three gardens and a dead man by Khaled Hakim | Poems from The Messenger House by Janet Sutherland | Two new poems by British-Canadian poet Pete Smith | Mob Think: Michael Blackburn reviews Kevin D. Williamson’s Smallest Minority: Independent Thinking in the Age of Mobs | Natalia Ginzburg’s On Women. The first translation in English, by Nicoletta Asciuto | Alan Wall: Considering I, alone, An interrogation of the isolated first person | Anthony Howell reviews Christopher Reid’s ‘Love, Loss and Chianti’ | Jeremy Hilton: An excerpt from Fulmar’s Wing | Peter Riley: Hakim and Byrne and a spring storm of ‘Poetry Notes’ | Simon Collings with news of African films, including a review of Mati Diop’s Atlantics |Alan Price reviews Anthony Howell’s mind-body reflections | Franca Mancinelli: Pages from the Croatian Notebook, in a translation by John Taylor |Anne Stevenson: A tribute to Eugene Dubnov | David Hay: Two poems, one in prose | Four poems from ‘Lectio Volant’ by Steve Ely | Seven very short stories by Ian Seed | Advice from all over: Peter Riley on How to Write Poetry | Geoffrey Hill and the Perturbation of Baruch by Anthony O’Hear | Bird of four tongues by Manash Firaq Bhattacharjee | Deirdre Mikolajcik: Abstract Wealth and Community in The Way We Live Now (Trollope Prize) | Nyssa Ruth Fahy on A Less-Beaten Path: Trollope’s West Indian fiction (Trollope Prize) | Blame it on the rain: flash fiction on two wheels, by Michael Buckingham Gray | True love—at 103: Breakfast with Mrs Greystone by S.D. Brown | The last Mantegna: fiction by Michelene Wandor | My first thirty years: A serial by Alan Macfarlane | Quotidian verse: She went to the hospital for an infection. By T. Smith-Daly | Tradition, by Enzo Kohara Franca. ‘My mother’s parents didn’t make it easy for her. In 1938 they immigrated from Sendai, where all men are Japanese, to São Paulo, where all men are Brazilian.’ | Peter Riley: Autumn reviews of new poetry | George Maciunas and Fluxus, reviewed by Simon Collings | The Political Agent in Kuwait, by Piers Michael Smith | Mother child: fiction by Conor Robin Madigan | The marital subtext of The State of the Union, reviewed by Michelene Wandor | Swincum-le-Beau, a puzzle-fiction in the spirit of Pevsner. By Shukburgh Ashby | Gibraltar Point and three more poems by Iain Twiddy | Six quite brief fictions by Simon Collings | James Gallant: Puttering with E.M. Cioran | Blind man’s fog and other poems by Patrick Williamson | None of us: a poem by Luke Emmett | Rankine’s uncomfortable citizenship by Michelene Wandor | Languages: A Ghazal by Manash Firaq Bhattacharjee | Seven more poems by Tom Lowenstein | Five poems from ‘Mattered by Tangents’ by Tim Allen | Anthony Howell: Freewheeling through some post-summer reading | ‘Noise’ and three more new poems by Maria de Araújo | A shelf of new poetry books for summer reviewed by Peter Riley in ‘Poetry Notes’ | Film: Simon Collings on Peter Strickland’s In Fabric | Michelene Wandor reviews Helen Dunmore’s Counting Backwards | Mauritius in three voices, by Emma Park | The hidden virtues of T-units and n-grams, by Davina Allison | Peter McCarey reviews W.D. Jackson’s latest Opus | Seven new poems by poet-ethnographer Tom Lowenstein | Anthony Howell: Empyrean Suite, an afterlife collaboration with Fawzi Karim | Christine Gallant reviews Herb Childress’s book on the life of the Adjunct Prof | The talk of The Dolphin, King’s Cross, as reported by Michael Mahony | Franca Mancinelli: Eight poems from Mala Kruna, in translations by John Taylor | A short question: Who will read short stories? David McVey answers | Eavesdropping on Olmecs: New poems by Jesse Glass | Two new poems by Laura Potts | Simon Collings on existence and its discontents in Capernaum | Peter Riley: Reviews yet more new prose-poetry | Anthony Rudolf remembers Turkish poet, novelist and essayist Moris Farhi | James Gallant sheds new light on the Duchess of Richmond’s ball in Brussels | Theatre: Third Person Theatre Co., and ‘The Noises’ reviewed by Anthony Howell | A fourth gulp of prose poems from ‘The Dice Cup’ by Max Jacob in a new translation by Ian Seed | Lots more short fiction: A new item by Michael Buckingham Gray and a full half-dozen by Simon Collings | Apollo 17 and the Cartoon Moon: Lunar poetry by James Bullion | Juvenal may be missing his moment: Satire for the millennium by Anthony Howell | Pickle-fingered truffle-snouter: fiction by Robert Fern | April Is the Cruellest Month: London fiction by Georgie Carroll | The Beginning and the End of Art…in Tasmania. By Tronn Overend | Kathy Stevens’s plate of fresh fiction: Everything in This Room is Edible | Boy, a new poem tall and lean by Tim Dooley | Beckett, Joyce, words, pictures — all reviewed by Peter O’Brien | Even more new translations by Ian Seed from Max Jacob’s Dice Cup | Poetry written in Britain’s ‘long moment’: A dialogue and portfolio of work by Peter Robinson and Tim Dooley | ‘Remembering Ovid’, a new poem by Alan Wall | Four new poems by Luke Emmett | Hugo Gibson on Discount entrepreneurship and the start-up accelerator | ‘Half a Black Moon’ and three more new poems by Seth Canner | Martin Stannard’s life-lessons: What I did and how I did it | Anthony Howell on three indelible images left after a season of exhibitions | You good? Anthony O’Hear reviews Christian Miller’s The Character Gap. | Peter Riley on Olson, Prynne, Paterson and ‘extremist’ poetry of the last century. | Three prose poems by Linda Black,with a concluding note on the form | Simon Collings watches Shoplifters, critically | Tim McGrath: In Keen and Quivering Ratio — Isaac Newton and Emily Dickinson together at last | Daragh Breen: A Boat-Shape of Birds: A sequence of poems | Peter Riley reviews First-Person ‘Identity’ Poems: New collections by Zaffar Kunial and Ishion Hutchinson | Marko Jobst’s A Ficto-Historical Theory of the London Underground reviewed by Michael Hampton | José-Flores Tappy: A Poetic Sequence from ‘Trás-os-Montes’ | Nick O’Hear: Brexit and the backstop and The tragedy of Brexit | Ian Seed: back in the building with Elvis | Nigel Wheale’s remembrance of ‘11.11.11.18’| Franca Mancinelli: Maria, towards Cartoceto, a memoir | Tamler Sommers’s Gospel of Honour, a review by Christopher Landrum | Typesetters delight: Simon Collings reviews Jane Monson’s British Prose Poetry | In Memoriam: Nigel Foxell by Anthony Rudolf | David Hackbridge Johnson rambles through Tooting | Auld acquaintances: Peter Riley on Barry MacSweeney and John James | ‘Listening to Country Music’ and more new poems by Kelvin Corcoran | Latest translations by Ian Seed from Max Jacob’s The Dice Cup | Claire Crowther: four poems from her forthcoming ‘Solar Cruise’| Anthony Howell on the lofty guardians of the new palace | War and the memory of war, a reflection by Jerry Palmer | The ‘true surrealist attentiveness’ of Ian Seed’s prose poems, reviewed by Jeremy Over | Antony Rowland: Three place-poems, a response to Elizabeth Gaskell’s Life of Brontë | New fiction by Gabi Reigh | Simon Collings reviews ‘Faces Places’ by Agnès Varda and JR | Ian Seed’s life-long love of short prose-poems | Michael Buckingham Gray’s extremely short story: ‘A woman’s best friend.’ | Simon Collings’s new fiction: Four short prose pieces | Anthony Costello: ‘Coleridge’s Eyes’ were his shaping spirits | Anthony Rudolf remembers poet and broadcaster Keith Bosley | Michael Hampton on Jeremy David Stock’s ‘Posthuman and categorically nebulous art writing’ | Peter O’Brien meets Paulette, Martin Sorrell’s ‘extravagent mystery’ of a mother | Anthony Howell reviews Lady Mary Wroth’s Love’s Victory | :: For much more, please consult our partial archive, below on this page.
Contact The Fortnightly.
Books received: Updated list.
-
LONDON
Readings in The Room: 33 Holcombe Road, Tottenham Hale, London N17 9AS – £5 entry plus donation for refreshments. All enquiries: 0208 801 8577
Poetry London: Current listings here.
Shearsman readings: 7:30pm at Swedenborg Hall, 20/21 Bloomsbury Way, London WC1. Further details here.NEW YORK
Time Out’s New York listings here.
2011: Golden-beak in eight parts. By George Basset (H. R. Haxton).
2012: The Invention of the Modern World in 18 parts. By Alan Macfarlane.
2013: Helen in three long parts. By Oswald Valentine Sickert.
2016: The Survival Manual by Alan Macfarlane. In eight parts.
2018: After the Snowbird, Comes the Whale, by Tom Lowenstein. Now running.
In the New Series
- The Current Principal Articles.
- A note on the Fortnightly’s ‘periodicity’.
- Cookie Policy
- Copyright, print archive & contact information.
- Editorial statement, submission guidelines, and proposing new Notices.
- For subscribers: Odd Volumes from The Fortnightly Review.
- Mrs Courtney’s history of The Fortnightly Review.
- Newsletter
- Submission guidelines.
- Support for the World Oral Literature Project.
- The Fortnightly Review’s email list.
- The Function of Criticism at the Present Time.
- The Initial Prospectus of The Fortnightly Review.
- The Trollope Prize.
- The Editors and Contributors.
- An Explanation of the New Series.
- Subscriptions & Commerce.
-
By Roger Berkowitz, Juliet du Boulay, Denis Boyles, Stan Carey, H.R. Haxton, Allen M. Hornblum, Alan Macfarlane, Anthony O’Hear, Andrew Sinclair, Harry Stein, Eugène-Melchior de Vogüé, and many others. Free access.
· James Thomson [B.V.]
Occ. Notes…
A dilemma for educators:
Philosophy and the public impact.
.
Michelene Wandor on Derek Walcott and the T.S. Eliot Prize.
.Nick Lowe: the true-blue Basher shows up for a friend.
-
Anthony Howell: The new libertine in exile.
.
Kate Hoyland: Inventing Asia, with Joseph Conrad and a Bible for tourists.
.
Who is Bruce Springsteen? by Peter Knobler.
.
Martin Sorrell on John Ashbery’s illumination of Arthur Rimbaud.
.
The beauty of Quantitative Easing.
.
Prohibition’s ‘original Progressives’.
.
European populism? Departments
0 Comments
Zero Dark Uncertainty.
Zero Dark Thirty
Directed by Kathryn Bigelow. Written by Mark Boal.
Cast: Jessica Chastain, Jason Clarke, Joel Edgerton
Chris Pratt, Jennifer Ehle, Mark Strong
Anapurna Pictures | Columbia Pictures
157 minutes | US Release 19 December 2012
By A. Jay Adler.
The capacity to be in uncertainty, without any – how apt the adjective– irritable reaching after fact and reason: how best to describe that penumbral sphere of presence reaching toward meaning that is the realm of art. How not to describe the world of politics. How not to describe GOP members of Congress over many months insisting upon the certain nature of the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya. How not to describe the irritable John McCain, the irritable Lindsey Graham, irritable others insisting that there were facts that the Obama administration was obscuring, facts different from any facts to which the administration itself laid claim, even damning facts, such as that the President had watched the attack in real time from the White House situation room and done nothing. The point is made still clearer: the dominion of politics is a far land from the realm of art, one in which facts are irritably asserted and reasons reached at, even if they need to be manufactured. So, then, the response of some, the purely political response, to Zero Dark Thirty.
Director Kathryn Bigelow and screenwriter Mark Boal have produced a depiction of modern intelligence and war craft that is austere, tense, and riveting in its power and sense of reality. In its restraint neither a glorification nor a facile critique of the national security danger zone, its mission is to tell an essential story of perhaps history’s greatest manhunt and to depict the concentrated focus of those professionals who dedicate themselves to such tasks in their lives at a level approached by few. It does not champion or excoriate them, though it does at times honor their dedication and expose – for the viewer to judge – their excesses.
Politicians and ideologues cannot have this complexity.
Acting CIA director Michael Morrell has written of the film that it “creates the strong impression that the enhanced interrogation techniques…were the key to finding Bin Laden.” He asserts, “That impression is false.”
Senate Intelligence Committee Chair Dianne Feinstein along with Carl Levin and John McCain, the two senior members of the Armed Services Committee, jointly authored a letter calling Zero Dark Thirty“grossly inaccurate.” The letter also said,
Yet G. Roger Denson, who has written on this subject several times for The Huffington Post has recounted (in “Zero Dark Thirty Account of Torture Verified by Media Record of Legislators and CIA Officials“) just how much evidence there is in the public record of the many claims contrary to what Morrell, Feinstein, Levin, and McCain assert. Officials of both the Bush and Obama administrations, including Leon Panetta, CIA director at the time of the bin Laden mission, have claimed a role for information obtained from torture in ultimately locating and killing Osama bin Laden.
LET US BE clear, however, just what such a dispute is about for those of us who will never have direct knowledge, or access to sources of knowledge, about what “really” happened. This, so far, is a dispute about what members of the government and the intelligence communities claim really happened. It is a dispute not about the truth of events, but about what accounts have been offered of events. It is a dispute about what any kind of dramatic depiction of events can reasonably represent as accurate without tendentiously slanting that depiction to make an ideological case. Many opponents and critics of the U.S. torture regime, in order to maintain their critique and advance their moral argument, will not tolerate suggestions that torture might at any time have been, not justifiable, but effective in eliciting information. In contrast, many proponents believe that any case for the effectiveness of torture justifies its use and makes in itself the moral case for it. This conflation of ethics with efficacy is itself yet one more partially buried argument in the attacks on Zero Dark Thirty.
In contrast, Boal and Bigelow made the intellectual and artistic judgments, based on available evidence and the inside sources they interviewed, that no honest depiction of events could represent torture as having been completely ineffectual and useless at all times and in all cases. More, even if it is true that torture produced no valuable intelligence, that is not what various authoritative sources have claimed, and Boal and Bigelow are in no position to render any independent, definitive judgment among the competing claims. The two made the additional, balancing judgment that ultimate success derived from myriad forms of intelligence gathering. Nothing makes this point more clearly than that according to the film’s time line, six years passed from the time any information may have been gleaned from torture and when Osama bin Laden was finally killed.
About the post-9/11 torture regime it may be true that any final determination of its efficacy will be impossible: what better indicator of that likelihood than that the videotapes of all torture sessions were destroyed at the direction of Jose Rodriguez Jr., then head of the CIA’s directorate of operations. Despite this reality, and despite the filmmakers’ fair-minded approach, taken with a sense of responsibility to the uncertainties of historical truth, partisans, including journalists, have turned a work of art into a political battlefield. No status is surer to distort truth, far beyond even disputed fact. Consider in this regard Steve Coll’s “‘Disturbing’ & ‘Misleading’” in The New York Review of Books.
Coll begins:
Indeed, the practice Coll cites is a commonplace in film, and just as common is the negative reaction to it by individuals with real-life connections to the events or fields of expertise depicted. Thus, generically, doctors are always objecting to the inaccuracy of medical procedure and terminology in dramatic representations of their work and lives – so, too, lawyers, and athletes, and so on. People whose lives are represented in art frequently are just unable to detach themselves from the facticity of their lives in order to gain sight of an artistic vision of the truth of their lives. Coll, a journalist and the president of the New America Foundation, a public policy institute, reenacts this typical response to a further degree. He cites the particular onscreen language of Zero Dark Thirty as making a claim beyond even reality to what he treats as somehow adhering to an even higher level of fact, “journalism,” and he seeks thereby to remove Zero Dark Thirty from the realm of art and to critique it as journalism. Yet in asserting this privileged claim for journalism, Coll misses how fictive narratives in the realist tradition do generically begin – are grounded – in just this deceptive appropriation of facticity in the service of truth.
“Call me Ishmael,” the narrator of Moby Dick opens his tale. “This is the saddest story I have ever heard,” begins The Good Soldier. “Mother died today,” Meursault informs us at the start of The Stranger. Still better, we have Huck: “You don’t know about me without you have read a book by the name of The Adventures of Tom Sawyer; but that ain’t no matter.” So in Huck we have a figure who in his own voice claims to be already renowned, even to have reality that precedes and stands outside of the new fiction in which we encounter him.
Or move over to film and one of the most successful low-cost publicity campaigns ever mounted, for the kind of story in which the confusion of reality and dramatization aims at the most visceral experience: “Everything you’ve heard is true” was the tag line for The Blair Witch Project, which pretended to be found film footage.
Of course, Zero Dark Thirty is no mere horror story entertainment. It claims to portray recent and profound historical events, so Coll cites the film’s use of actual 9/11 audio in order to transpose the film to the field of journalism and then to proceed explicitly to refer to and criticize it as journalism throughout. Yet Coll fails to note a countervailing characteristic of the film: none of its characters are referred to by real-life names. Call me Ishmael, but my real name is Jacob. Call me anything because I do not really exist. Call me the Al-Qaeda operative Anmar because I am a composite of several people. Call me Joseph Bradley even though someone who fulfilled my role in real life is actually named Jonathan Banks because the facticity that name would call up is problematic. Are these departures from exactitude slippages of journalistic execution or are they purposeful acts aimed at a different form of truth than that sought by journalism? Coll and others who cite the film’s opening play for authenticity, by its invocation of “actual events” – the common practice – neglect to acknowledge the invariable and contrasting ending denial, the “all persons fictitious disclaimer.” No claimant to journalistic practice would make such a disclaimer. On the other hand, it is the task of any dramatic artwork in the realist tradition to play for the credence, the suspension of disbelief, of the audience, that it may tempt the audience with the body of fact so as to shadow for it the ghost of the truth.
SO MUCH OF the public discussion and criticism centers on Zero Dark Thirty’s scenes of torture, depicted, according to Morrell, as “the key to finding Bin Laden.” For Feinstein, Levin, and McCain, “the movie clearly implies that the CIA’s coercive interrogation techniques were effective in eliciting important information.” However, few critics examine – though Coll does – exactly how information associated with the torture sequences is revealed in the film. Those with political agendas have criticized the film more precisely for not providing a fuller account of the torture program. That is their agenda because of the anti-torture tendentiousness the film does not offer. Zero Dark Thirty, however, is not a film about the torture program. It is a film about the hunt for bin Laden. Neither does the film give a full account of the CIA presence in Pakistan or the extended war in Afghanistan, both of which factor in the film. It is a film about the hunt for bin Laden. The first illegitimate act of art criticism is to critique the work of art for not being something other than it is.
What the film does portray in the scenes of Anmar’s torture is that during the torture he reveals nothing. He does not blurt out the pressing truths he knows in order to halt his pain. Under the most extreme forms of duress, nearly a shell, Anmar, who is presumed to have information about an upcoming attack – which in the film we are shown is the July 2005 London bombings – actually feebly taunts his interrogator, Dan, in answer to the question “when,” by providing successively in his fading voice every day of the week. In precisely the extreme hypothetical case often posed to test the limits of opposition to torture, the “ticking bomb” scenario in which many lives may be immediately at risk, Zero Dark Thirty shows torture to fail.
It is only after Anmar’s torture has ceased, when in recovery and during the pretense of a friendly meal, that he is tricked into revealing something. He is told that while in a state of delirium he did reveal the details of the bombing. (He has no knowledge of the actual events and the bombing’s success.) Then, in responding to easy questioning about how he escaped Afghanistan after the U.S. invasion, he provides the names of his traveling companions. All but one are known to his questioners. The one unknown name is Abu Ahmed al-Kuwaiti. From this name Jessica Chastain’s “Maya” takes her lead, which will produce, in fact, a dead end, to be reopened some years later by other forms of intelligence.
These scenes, then, do not show, according to the popular imagination, torture extracting good information from a victim seeking surcease from pain. Is it, in contrast, a depiction of torture “working” because the victim, grateful for a period of recovery and dreading a resumption, will now with a clear head cooperate to avoid further pain? How can we know? When the first rumors of an American torture regime began to leak out, there were many interviews with military – not CIA – interrogators, including veterans of the Second World War, who gave their accounts of how successful non-physically coercive interrogation can be. Might Anmar have been deceived and lulled into casually cooperative conversation without many rounds of torture, but through other methods of interrogation? Coll writes that, one way or the other, “[t]here is no empirical evidence to support this argument. Among other things, no responsible social scientist would condone peer-reviewed experiments to compare torture’s results to those from less coercive questioning.”
People are accordingly left to form their views of torture’s effectiveness on grounds something other than scientific, and we see from the debate over Zero Dark Thirty that what often influences claims about the effectiveness of torture are people’s ideological tendencies and political views, most specifically their moral view of torture.
It is, actually, the “in our name” aspect of Maya’s journey that is so instructive about Zero Dark Thirty and torture. It helps – whatever any factual correspondence to reality there may be – that we stand from the start with Maya, and her tender-faced beginnings, and not, say, Jason Clarke’s more directly brutal Dan, who performs those early tortures. If we are not too restricted by political or moral alienation from entering into sympathy with Maya, and the overall mission to avenge 9/11 by bringing justice to Osama bin Laden, at least as the film’s characters experience it, then Maya’s journey becomes partly our own. How obsessed were any of us over those ten years, in our lingering disturbance and darker imaginings, with an ultimate vengeance against Osama bin Laden?
In her beginnings, the torture is difficult for Maya to view, but she will not be spared it or turn away from it, even when the offer is made. Neither, one might argue, did any American who, learning of the torture – reading, daily, American journalism’s acquiescence in the use of the euphemistic “enhanced interrogation” – did not protest the torture. Then, from those beginnings, Maya arrives at a pivotal scene.
By the time of the interrogation portrayed as that of Abu Faraj al-Libi, Maya has become the interrogator. She no longer looks on as Dan tortures. She is in charge. However, Maya has not the physical endowment to engage the torture herself. She interrogates, but a male counterpart sits across a table from al-Libi. The counterpart is the muscle. Whenever Maya is dissatisfied with al-Libi’s answers, she forcefully bumps the right arm of her male colleague, who then reaches across the table and bashes al-Libi in the face with his fist.
CRITICS OF THE film ignore all of the elements that argue against their insistent treatment of a dramatic film, a work of art, as an historical record or film documentary. So how often must it be said? No, if you wish to learn the biography of Lou Gehrig, you do not watch Pride of the Yankees. If you care to study the details of JFK’s assassination or Richard Nixon’s life, you do not view Oliver Stone’s JFK or Nixon. Evaluate that last as you will, it does not provide a comprehensive and reliable record of Richard Nixon’s career – but it does offer a vision of the truth of who Richard Nixon was and what his career amounted to.
Because some critics of Zero Dark Thirty come to the film seeking in it the simplicity of an ideological stance rather than the human complexity of art, they seek to tally factual representations as politics on an abacus of acts. They lose interest in the behavior of humans. So even as Maya is advancing toward torture, Dan retreats from it, not as any moral judgment on himself, but from spiritual fatigue. The monkeys he has maintained as pets, in an emotional relation he has withheld from his victims, have died, and it is at that time that he tells Maya, “I’ve seen too many guys naked…I’ve got to do something normal for a while.” He warns Maya, too, in one of very few and brief references to the home-front politics of torture, that those politics are changing, and she does not want to be left holding the “dog collar.”
Later, at CIA headquarters, Dan, seeking financial support for Maya’s ongoing pursuit, tells a superior that he is prepared to defend his interrogations. He has not lost his belief in the justness of what he did, anymore than has Jose Rodriquez, Jr. – and that is a fact. The film does not traffic in such facile character development and thematic resolutions as to suggest loss of faith and conversion. But Dan is altered. How he is altered is not estimated here by the tallying of fact beads or a record of confession, but through the human calculus of art. For if all we needed to find our way through the maze of the world were the facts, we could leave our lives in the hands of the crime scene investigators and the forensic accounts – and the reporters. However, it is once we are finished arguing the facts, if we ever are, and while we are arguing over them, that we need to make meaning of them, and of their absence, and of the arguments we make with facts, and art is one of the ways we do that, whether it gets you reelected or a cheer from the platform police.
IN ITS CLOSING, regretfully, Zero Dark Thirty offers its one truly trite scene. Mission accomplished, Maya flies home at last on an empty troop transport. She is its only passenger. That much is good and as it should be. She has been alone all along. It may be that this and what follows is factual; it may not be. If so, only the real Maya would know. It does not matter.
What does follow?
Seated and buckled in for takeoff, reflective and in close up, Maya begins to cry. Tears run down her face. This is the trite part. Like a character who gives herself a long hard stare in a bathroom mirror, to suggest her self-questioning, self-doubt, self-alienation, the release of tears as the signal close at the end of a long, vital struggle, in order to reflect painful catharsis, has been dramatized too many times to deliver the emotional power the tears are meant to convey. Nonetheless, they are there for us to make meaning of. What do we make of them?
Soldiers who return traumatized from war – and Maya has been one kind, her own kind, of intelligence soldier – are scarred by experience. But experience, in war and out, is not just what a solider has witnessed or had done to her. Experience is also what she has done, to others and to herself, the acts she has committed as well as those committed against her. We do not know why Maya cries. We project. How much of the story just dramatized must we tendentiously omit from reception in order to tell ourselves that she cries only from some simple release of long contained tension and not for reasons greater and more complex?
The following passage from the December 25, 2012, New York Times obituary of actor Charles Durning is instructive in this regard. Durning was in the first wave of soldiers to land at Omaha Beach on D-Day.
Ideologues, politicians, and all the case-makers are thus to the artist like the scorpion to the frog, passengers unto death. The life of a frog is a perilous one.
Late in Zero Dark Thirty, Maya has made her claim, among all the intelligence equivocators, including Dan, that it is one hundred percent certain that Osama bin Laden is living in the complex in Abbottabad. She alone before the national security advisor and the man who would be Leon Panetta, but who is not named as the CIA director, has staked her claim with confidence. Leaving the meeting, Panetta and an assistant are about to descend in an elevator when the assistant declares to Panetta, to account for Maya, “She’s very smart.”
Panetta quickly glances at the assistant, responding to dismiss that offering as any kind of adequate account of who Maya is, or in this instance needs to be, among the perennial best and brightest at the tip of the national sword.
“We’re all smart,” he says.
♦
A. Jay Adler is professor of English at Los Angeles Southwest College and contributing poetry editor of West. His recent fiction, “La Revolución,” appears in The Ampersand Review. He is currently at work on a memoir of his father’s life, The Twentieth Century Passes. Adler blogs on politics, art, and culture at the sad red earth.
Related
Publication: Friday, 29 March 2013, at 13:22.
Options: Archive for A. Jay Adler. Bookmark the permalink. Follow comments here with the RSS feed. Post a comment or leave a trackback.