Skip to content

Noted: Autism, a six-foot putt, and a sweet old age.

By JOHN DONVAN and CAREN ZUCKER [The Atlantic] – The needs of those with lower-functioning varieties of autism will be profound and constant.

How we respond to those needs will be shaped in great measure by how we choose to view adults with autism. We can dissociate from them, regarding them as tragically broken persons, and hope we are humane enough to shoulder the burden of meeting their basic needs. This is the view that sees the disabled in general as wards of the community, morally and perhaps legally, and that, in the relatively recent past, often “solved” the “problem” of these disabled adults by warehousing them for life—literally in wards.

Alternatively, we can dispense with the layers of sorrow, and interpret autism as but one more wrinkle in the fabric of humanity. Practically speaking, this does not mean pretending that adults with autism do not need help. But it does mean replacing pity toward them with ambition for them. Continue reading “Noted: Autism, a six-foot putt, and a sweet old age.” »

Noted: Does the professoriate know what students need to know? No.

By KAI HAMMERMEISTER [Chronicle of Higher Education] – Thomas Jefferson attempted a student-driven model for his University of Virginia but quickly abandoned it. And, of course, Italy and Spain themselves have long since replaced student governance with state control. Yet it is [José Ortega y Gasset’s] intention to again place the student at the center of the university and thus to renew this Italo-Spanish contribution to the discourse and practice of higher education.

Ortega derives his student-centered model from the economic principle of scarcity that defines a good. Only because the lifetimes of students are limited is it necessary to make decisions about the content and periodization of education. The starting point for all educational decisions must, therefore, be the capacity of the student to learn, he argues, not the available knowledge at large nor the research specialities of the professoriate.

Continue reading “Noted: Does the professoriate know what students need to know? No.” »

Noted: Famous author goes, 'No more present-tense narrative, please.'

By PHILIP PULLMAN [The Guardian] – What I dislike about the present-tense narrative is its limited range of expressiveness. I feel claustrophobic, always pressed up against the immediate.

I want all the young present-tense storytellers (the old ones have won prizes and are incorrigible) to allow themselves to stand back and show me a wider temporal perspective. I want them to feel able to say what happened, what usually happened, what sometimes happened, what had happened before something else happened, what might happen later, what actually did happen later, and so on: to use the full range of English tenses.

Continue reading “Noted: Famous author goes, 'No more present-tense narrative, please.'” »

Noted: Maybe calling evil "bad" is just another example of hate speech.

By RON ROSENBAUM [First Things] – Evil has gotten a bad name lately. It always was a name for some sort of badness, yes; but lately the word sounds antiquated, the product of a less-sophisticated age. Evil belongs to an old, superstitious world of black and white, and we all know now that everything is gray, right? It belongs to a world of blame in which the Enlightenment tells us that “to understand all is to forgive all”—no blame, just explanation. There are some who argue it’s an unnecessary word: Having no ontological reality, no necessary use, it’s merely a semantic trap, a dead end.

Continue reading “Noted: Maybe calling evil "bad" is just another example of hate speech.” »

The father of natural selection does not pick. He strums.

Noted: The kind of antihumanist atheism a man can believe in.

By JAMES K. A. SMITH – [The Immanent Frame] – “Strangely enough,” Foucault mused, “man—the study of whom is supposed by the naïve to be the oldest investigation since Socrates—is probably no more than a kind of rift in the order of things.” He is “only a recent invention, a figure not yet two centuries old, a new wrinkle in our knowledge” who “will disappear again as soon as that knowledge has discovered a new form.”

Foucault’s flippant requiem for “man” reflects a midcentury antihumanism in European thought, which, in the wake of two World Wars in the heart of Europe, had become suspicious of the “anthropotheism” of humanism wherein “Man” replaced the God who had died. And it is this story that is told so brilliantly by Stefanos Geroulanos in An Atheism that Is Not Humanist Emerges in French Thought. For these antihumanists, humanistic atheism had never really gotten over its theological tendencies; so the result of the death of God was the divinization of Man. Continue reading “Noted: The kind of antihumanist atheism a man can believe in.” »

Noted: Why a good scientist should be sceptical of science.

By ANTHONY GOTTLIEB [More Intelligent Life] – No group of believers has more reason to be sure of its own good sense than today’s professional scientists. There is, or should be, no mystery about why it is always more rational to believe in science than in anything else, because this is true merely by definition. What makes a method of enquiry count as scientific is not that it employs microscopes, rats, computers or people in stained white coats, but that it seeks to test itself at every turn. If a method is as rigorous and cautious as it can be, it counts as good science; if it isn’t, it doesn’t. Yet this fact sets a puzzle. If science is careful scepticism writ large, shouldn’t a scientific cast of mind require one to be sceptical of science itself?

Continue reading “Noted: Why a good scientist should be sceptical of science.” »

Noted: Photos from the center of Europe, looking out.

From PARIS PHOTO 2010 [Lens Culture] – Photography is one of Central Europe’s richest forms of artistic expression. From the very beginning of the 20th century, Bratislava, Budapest, Prague, Ljubljana and Warsaw were home to an intellectual avant-garde promoting a new vision of photography. Many artists from these cities revolutionized the history of photography, from André Kertész and Mohology-Nagy to František Drtikol, Josef Sudek, Brassaï and Robert Capa.

Since the fall of the Berlin Wall, the countries of the former Eastern Bloc have undergone a political, social and cultural revival. Photography remains the preferred language through which Central European artists express a new political and social reality, borrowing from diverse practices ranging from the visual and performing arts to documentary and subjective forms.

Continue reading “Noted: Photos from the center of Europe, looking out.” »

Noted: The history of proto-mojo.

By LAURA ROSENTHAL [The Long Eighteenth] – In its contemporary meaning, “It,” Joseph Roach explains, was “coined in 1927 by a British expatriate, romance-author, and Hollywood tastemaker Elinor Glyn (1864-1943)” to describe the unusual allure of certain people. Glyn herself had “a quirky interest in animal magnetism.” For Roach, though, Glyn was not the inventor of “It” but a pivotal figure who reveals “It’s” transatlantic migration. In Roach’s study, Glyn also serves as a synecdoche for a larger phenomenon of cultural transmission, providing a bridge between eighteenth-century theatricality and early twentieth-century Hollywood. A “Tory radical” with a fascination for the Stuarts, Glyn helped shape early Hollywood sensibilities. She fashioned Clara Bow as the “It Girl”—both a new phenomenon and an echo of a particular charisma/ stigmata born in London, 1660. Continue reading “Noted: The history of proto-mojo.” »

Noted: Reading a good book just for pain.

By CHRIS GRAHAM [The Millions] – A few weeks ago I ventured into the English Faculty Library at the University of Oxford to borrow a work of fiction. A friend had recommended the novel Money: A Suicide Note, by Martin Amis, and for a variety of reasons the only library from which I could borrow one of the University’s fifteen copies was the English Faculty. (All but two of the copies were owned by college libraries – none my own, and colleges do not lend to non-members – or by libraries that do not permit borrowing to anyone. The second circulation copy was out.) Although my subject is History and Politics, the English Faculty does permit non-members to borrow from its collection, but with some rather curious reservations.

When I presented the volume to be checked-out, the librarian examined my card (which discloses my subject), pursed her lips, pressed her palms protectively over Martin’s image on the dust jacket, and clearly made herself ready to say something that she regarded as unpleasant:

Continue reading “Noted: Reading a good book just for pain.” »

Noted: Claude Chabrol, 1930-2010.

An OBITUARY [Daily Telegraph] – Chabrol used the profits from Le Beau Serge and Les Cousins to fund Eric Rohmer’s Le Signe du Lion (1959) and Philippe de Broca’s Les Jeux de l’Amour (1960) and Le Farceur (1961), and to help pay for Jacques Rivette’s Paris Nous Appartient (1960). He also acted as “technical adviser” on Jean-Luc Godard’s first feature, A Bout de Souffle (1959), but this was a token credit to enable Godard to piggyback into the cinema on Chabrol’s shoulders; in practice, Godard was an innovator who needed no technical advice.

Squat, bespectacled and rotund, Chabrol played the joker in the pack, resembling nothing so much as a startled owl. It was an image that did not always redound to his advantage, casting doubt on his seriousness of purpose. He was a bon vivant and something of a gourmet, losing no opportunity in his films for a feast or a banquet. Wags said that they would not recognise a Chabrol film without, at the very least, a good domestic “blow-out”.

Continue reading “Noted: Claude Chabrol, 1930-2010.” »

Noted: Adjusting Facebook to keep the wives happy.

By SEAN TABB [The Morning News] – There was a time when all one required to be a successful bigamist was a job with frequent travel, a discreet accountant, and a Herculean sex drive. With the advent of the internet and the ubiquity of social networking, those days are over. Now that everyone and their father and his two wives has the ability to share intimate personal information and photos online, it’s gotten a lot harder to carry on two marriages simultaneously without one spouse finding out about the other.

Bigamy in the age of Facebook is tricky, but it’s not impossible. Continue reading “Noted: Adjusting Facebook to keep the wives happy.” »

Noted: Why Jews only go to Temple twice a year.


By Rabbi NILES GOLDSTEIN [Big Think]
Continue reading “Noted: Why Jews only go to Temple twice a year.” »

Noted: How technology created Walt Whitman's very large pile of 'Leaves'.

By AMANDA GAILEY [NINES] – Leaves of Grass, the centerpiece of Whitman’s writing, and one of the most important books in U.S. literary history, is also one of the most difficult texts in literary history to define. Whitman envisioned his magnum opus as a living, growing, organic being, and he saw the book through six significantly different editions in his lifetime, most of which contained many variant issues. Today we are accustomed to a relative homogeneity among copies of a particular edition: modern printing and marketing ensure that, provided we both own either the hardback or paperback issue, your copy of a particular volume will be almost imperceptibly different from mine. But Whitman and his readers worked within a technologically different publishing economy, and most editions of Leaves of Grass would have been available in often strikingly different forms. Continue reading “Noted: How technology created Walt Whitman's very large pile of 'Leaves'.” »

Calamo: Republicans and the Wall Street Journal's pragmatic principles.

THE WALL STREET JOURNAL argues today that, as a matter of pragmatism, conservatives should back liberal Republican Mike Castle over his rival in Delaware’s GOP primary, tea party conservative Christine O’Donnell, a candidate dismissed by the Journal as “an itinerant conservative commentator and activist who is supported by some in the tea party movement and national talk radio.” To make the point, the Journal offers yet another paraphrased reprise of William F. Buckley’s rather empty maxim urging votes for the “most conservative candidate who could win.”

Continue reading “Calamo: Republicans and the Wall Street Journal's pragmatic principles.” »