<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Fortnightly Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk</link>
	<description>&#039;the stroke of an oar given in true time&#039;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 07:32:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Poetry Prize Culture and the Aberdeen Angus. by Anon</title>
		<link>http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/2012/04/poetry-angus/comment-page-1/#comment-2713</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 07:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/?p=6902#comment-2713</guid>
		<description>The prize culture is one of the things wrong with poetry in the UK today. It discriminates poets from certain backgrounds and focuses on an elitist Oxbridge, middle-class set. 

The cycle is already repeating itself. Take a look at the Salt Book of Younger Poets. The vast majority of them are from an Oxbridge background. Some will have collections picked up by Faber &amp; Faber, Picador etc, nominated for prizes, teach and the cycle continues.

The Faber New Poets scheme is another example of this sham. Scouts were sent out to find promising poets in the UK. Were any older poets chosen? No. Any poets from low to mid ranked universities? No. Experimental or performance poets? No.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The prize culture is one of the things wrong with poetry in the UK today. It discriminates poets from certain backgrounds and focuses on an elitist Oxbridge, middle-class set. </p>
<p>The cycle is already repeating itself. Take a look at the Salt Book of Younger Poets. The vast majority of them are from an Oxbridge background. Some will have collections picked up by Faber &amp; Faber, Picador etc, nominated for prizes, teach and the cycle continues.</p>
<p>The Faber New Poets scheme is another example of this sham. Scouts were sent out to find promising poets in the UK. Were any older poets chosen? No. Any poets from low to mid ranked universities? No. Experimental or performance poets? No.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Watching &#8216;Einstein on the Beach&#8217; through a periscope. by Gwendolyn Leick</title>
		<link>http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/2012/05/einstein-beach/comment-page-1/#comment-2707</link>
		<dc:creator>Gwendolyn Leick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 18:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/?p=7214#comment-2707</guid>
		<description>I saw it also on Saturday. Found it very much product of its time - over-indulgent in a stoned sort of way and I really disliked some  of Wilson&#039;s sets and the overlaying of rather clunky symbolism (moon, paper airplanes, bloody backward running clocks, the projected images etc). Childs&#039; choreography was a welcome relief. The music in the last hour and half was terrific, especially the long solos (sax! organ! even the fiddle) and the voice pieces. Also, much of what would have been fresh and new then is now part of main stream performance (esp. opera), such as slowed down movements, the grey suits etc.

Your idea in this essay to refer to Shute&#039;s On the Beach was very good though. I remember weeping copiously when I read the book as teenager. 

Wilson&#039;s &#039;opera&#039; is oddly post-modern, part kitsch, part knowing self-referential irony and Glass&#039; score with its minimal richness seems to do its own thing (fortunately I thought).

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw it also on Saturday. Found it very much product of its time &#8211; over-indulgent in a stoned sort of way and I really disliked some  of Wilson&#8217;s sets and the overlaying of rather clunky symbolism (moon, paper airplanes, bloody backward running clocks, the projected images etc). Childs&#8217; choreography was a welcome relief. The music in the last hour and half was terrific, especially the long solos (sax! organ! even the fiddle) and the voice pieces. Also, much of what would have been fresh and new then is now part of main stream performance (esp. opera), such as slowed down movements, the grey suits etc.</p>
<p>Your idea in this essay to refer to Shute&#8217;s On the Beach was very good though. I remember weeping copiously when I read the book as teenager. </p>
<p>Wilson&#8217;s &#8216;opera&#8217; is oddly post-modern, part kitsch, part knowing self-referential irony and Glass&#8217; score with its minimal richness seems to do its own thing (fortunately I thought).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Story of a song. by Maggie</title>
		<link>http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/2012/04/story-song/comment-page-1/#comment-2681</link>
		<dc:creator>Maggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 14:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/?p=6888#comment-2681</guid>
		<description>Probably the best article on Marianne&#039;s life I&#039;ve ever read. Thank you Anthony!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably the best article on Marianne&#8217;s life I&#8217;ve ever read. Thank you Anthony!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Poetry Prize Culture and the Aberdeen Angus. by M. G. Stephens</title>
		<link>http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/2012/04/poetry-angus/comment-page-1/#comment-2652</link>
		<dc:creator>M. G. Stephens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 19:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/?p=6902#comment-2652</guid>
		<description>This simply is one of the most refreshing essays on poetry I have ever read, bar none. It will probably be understood therefore as simply the best of its kind, in its time, or maybe of any kind. And that&#039;s a fact!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This simply is one of the most refreshing essays on poetry I have ever read, bar none. It will probably be understood therefore as simply the best of its kind, in its time, or maybe of any kind. And that&#8217;s a fact!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Poetry Prize Culture and the Aberdeen Angus. by Kate Ruse</title>
		<link>http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/2012/04/poetry-angus/comment-page-1/#comment-2642</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate Ruse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 06:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/?p=6902#comment-2642</guid>
		<description>Excellent although somewhat depressing article. Ah well, back to the hill farming!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent although somewhat depressing article. Ah well, back to the hill farming!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Poetry Prize Culture and the Aberdeen Angus. by Anthony Howell</title>
		<link>http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/2012/04/poetry-angus/comment-page-1/#comment-2630</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Howell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 21:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/?p=6902#comment-2630</guid>
		<description>Perhaps poets should feel proud to be vilified.  I have always aspired to that epithet on Lord Byron - &quot;Mad, bad and dangerous to know.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps poets should feel proud to be vilified.  I have always aspired to that epithet on Lord Byron &#8211; &#8220;Mad, bad and dangerous to know.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Poetry Prize Culture and the Aberdeen Angus. by Fenella Copplestone</title>
		<link>http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/2012/04/poetry-angus/comment-page-1/#comment-2627</link>
		<dc:creator>Fenella Copplestone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 14:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/?p=6902#comment-2627</guid>
		<description>I like the idea of poets wearing rosettes-always!What a lively article,worth reading. Why not have a lottery instead? Poets enter, a draw is made by somebody preposterous, then the winner is - yes, the BEST poet!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the idea of poets wearing rosettes-always!What a lively article,worth reading. Why not have a lottery instead? Poets enter, a draw is made by somebody preposterous, then the winner is &#8211; yes, the BEST poet!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Genealogy in America. by Drew Moore</title>
		<link>http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/2011/11/genealogy-in-america/comment-page-1/#comment-2616</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2012 16:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/?p=5462#comment-2616</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the enthusiastic comments, fellow genealogists and readers! Sue, I know Jack well. I&#039;d like to get down to interview him on film soon, since he&#039;s the local authority on the families of northern Harrison Co of the last 150 years or so. He also happens to own an 1800s Derbyshire sugar bowl once owned by Dicky&#039;s nephew Jeptha.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the enthusiastic comments, fellow genealogists and readers! Sue, I know Jack well. I&#8217;d like to get down to interview him on film soon, since he&#8217;s the local authority on the families of northern Harrison Co of the last 150 years or so. He also happens to own an 1800s Derbyshire sugar bowl once owned by Dicky&#8217;s nephew Jeptha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Race, writing, and skipping through minefields. by Ralph</title>
		<link>http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/2012/04/derbyshire/comment-page-1/#comment-2582</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/?p=6814#comment-2582</guid>
		<description>John Derbyshire, lately of National Review Online and currently a writer for Takimag.com, has stirred up a firestorm of protest with an allegedly &quot;racist&quot; article.  Now myriads of conservatives (so-called) are posting, posing and posturing just like liberals in their rush to condemn him.

I read Derbyshire&#039;s comments and was not offended in the least.  Basically, all he said was that whites and Asians should caution their children to avoid violence from blacks.  Did he lie about anything?  Distort the truth?  No. 

Blacks are more violent than any other racial group, a fact supported by decades of crime statistics as well as recent events.  I don&#039;t like this terrible truth and would change it if I could; however, reality has a way of ignoring my wishes, even when they spring from enlightenment and tolerance.

What Derbyshire was arguing for was what Dinesh D&#039;Souza once described as &quot;rational discrimination.&quot;  If you&#039;re a taxi driver interested in staying alive, you don&#039;t pick up seedy-looking black males in rough sections of town at night.  (Black taxi drivers also tend to follow this rule.)  If you&#039;re white, you don&#039;t wander through black neighborhoods in the middle of the night.  Many blacks hate white people and many blacks are violent. 

Of course, many blacks are also good, decent people, but you have to play the odds if you are interested in your physical survival.  That&#039;s why Derbyshire advised his kids to avoid large concentrations of blacks that they do not know.  I assume the reader has heard of the recent &quot;wildings&quot; of black youths in many places, like the Wisconsin State Fair where mobs of blacks attacked whites for no reason other than their race.  Those beaten white kids would have been better off if their parents had warned them as Derbyshire suggests.

It amazes me at how thoroughly brainwashed the American public is on the subject of race, and conservatives are not immune to the social pressures, ostracism, job loss and public condemnation that comes from telling the unvarnished truth.  The term &quot;racist&quot; in its current meaning refers to anyone who is unwilling to continue advancing polite fictions about race in America. 

I was reading Red State today and was mildly disgusted at the opprobrium that site heaped on Derbyshire.  Of course, National Review Online isn&#039;t terribly conservative anymore, preferring to present a socially correct image to the world rather than deal with unpleasant facts. 

Black violence is a problem, one that is unlikely to be solved without honest discussion.  Now listen to the crickets chirping in the comments section as fellow conservatives run in terror from a topic they have been conditioned to avoid at all costs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Derbyshire, lately of National Review Online and currently a writer for Takimag.com, has stirred up a firestorm of protest with an allegedly &#8220;racist&#8221; article.  Now myriads of conservatives (so-called) are posting, posing and posturing just like liberals in their rush to condemn him.</p>
<p>I read Derbyshire&#8217;s comments and was not offended in the least.  Basically, all he said was that whites and Asians should caution their children to avoid violence from blacks.  Did he lie about anything?  Distort the truth?  No. </p>
<p>Blacks are more violent than any other racial group, a fact supported by decades of crime statistics as well as recent events.  I don&#8217;t like this terrible truth and would change it if I could; however, reality has a way of ignoring my wishes, even when they spring from enlightenment and tolerance.</p>
<p>What Derbyshire was arguing for was what Dinesh D&#8217;Souza once described as &#8220;rational discrimination.&#8221;  If you&#8217;re a taxi driver interested in staying alive, you don&#8217;t pick up seedy-looking black males in rough sections of town at night.  (Black taxi drivers also tend to follow this rule.)  If you&#8217;re white, you don&#8217;t wander through black neighborhoods in the middle of the night.  Many blacks hate white people and many blacks are violent. </p>
<p>Of course, many blacks are also good, decent people, but you have to play the odds if you are interested in your physical survival.  That&#8217;s why Derbyshire advised his kids to avoid large concentrations of blacks that they do not know.  I assume the reader has heard of the recent &#8220;wildings&#8221; of black youths in many places, like the Wisconsin State Fair where mobs of blacks attacked whites for no reason other than their race.  Those beaten white kids would have been better off if their parents had warned them as Derbyshire suggests.</p>
<p>It amazes me at how thoroughly brainwashed the American public is on the subject of race, and conservatives are not immune to the social pressures, ostracism, job loss and public condemnation that comes from telling the unvarnished truth.  The term &#8220;racist&#8221; in its current meaning refers to anyone who is unwilling to continue advancing polite fictions about race in America. </p>
<p>I was reading Red State today and was mildly disgusted at the opprobrium that site heaped on Derbyshire.  Of course, National Review Online isn&#8217;t terribly conservative anymore, preferring to present a socially correct image to the world rather than deal with unpleasant facts. </p>
<p>Black violence is a problem, one that is unlikely to be solved without honest discussion.  Now listen to the crickets chirping in the comments section as fellow conservatives run in terror from a topic they have been conditioned to avoid at all costs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Invention of the Modern World 1. by Rick</title>
		<link>http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/2012/04/invention1/comment-page-1/#comment-2580</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 16:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/?p=6630#comment-2580</guid>
		<description>I think this is written for academics. Who is Fukuzawa Yukichi (sp?) and Gundar Somebody and all those other people? I can see putting them in your notes but they don&#039;t mean anything to me. I like the idea of this book though, so I will want to read more but why start out with so many names nobody knows?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is written for academics. Who is Fukuzawa Yukichi (sp?) and Gundar Somebody and all those other people? I can see putting them in your notes but they don&#8217;t mean anything to me. I like the idea of this book though, so I will want to read more but why start out with so many names nobody knows?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: fortnightlyreview.co.uk @ 2012-05-18 05:25:48 -->
