<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Fortnightly Review &#187; Notes &amp; Comment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/category/notescomments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk</link>
	<description>&#039;the stroke of an oar given in true time&#039;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 12:03:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Notes on the complexities of Post-Modernism.</title>
		<link>http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/2012/01/notes-post-modernism/</link>
		<comments>http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/2012/01/notes-post-modernism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 14:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art & Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Notes & Comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Principal Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Jencks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/?p=6083</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Charles Jencks: In architecture, the movement has returned after the Neo-Modernism of the 1990s, in every way but by name. The world is now saturated by the confused labels of Modernism and Post-Modernism, but the streams of concerns to which these labels used to refer are continuing. That is apparent in architecture with the digital ornament (a leading movement), the iconic building (with its many marvellous and woeful examples), and the hybrid “time buildings” (that mix past, present and future architectural codes).]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/2012/01/notes-post-modernism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Postmodernism and history.</title>
		<link>http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/2012/01/postmodernism-and-history/</link>
		<comments>http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/2012/01/postmodernism-and-history/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 19:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art & Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Notes & Comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Principal Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony Howell]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/?p=5954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anthony Howell: Without postmodernism’s new take on history, Alison Marchant’s ‘archival art’ might never have surfaced, including her exhibition celebrating the cross-dressing (and very postmodern) Hannah Cullwick and the fetish photography of her eccentric husband Arthur Munby (who were an 1860’s couple similar in a way to Goude and Jones).]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/2012/01/postmodernism-and-history/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An &#8216;Iron Lady&#8217; turns to rust.</title>
		<link>http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/2011/12/iron-lady/</link>
		<comments>http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/2011/12/iron-lady/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 19:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film, Television, Video & Theatre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Notes & Comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Fortnightly Review of Films and Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/?p=5891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Drew Moore: In Streep’s Thatcher we see a ball-busting leader well equipped with warmongering and anti-socialist rhetoric, as well as a schoolmarm rapidly alienating her cowering Cabinet. Most affecting, we see a feeble woman trying to preserve her dignity surrounded by guardians who have already consigned her to senility. One of the most enjoyable scenes is one in which the utterly lucid patient, with acerbic wit, puts her patronizing doctor in his place.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/2011/12/iron-lady/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A brief guide to Oxford&#8217;s &#8216;Very Short Introductions&#8217;.</title>
		<link>http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/2011/12/oup-short-introductions/</link>
		<comments>http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/2011/12/oup-short-introductions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 01:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books & Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Notes & Comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Fortnightly Review of Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/?p=5780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michelene Wandor: The first ‘Very Short Introduction’ appeared in the mid-1990s, and now there are nearly 300 books, which have sold over three million copies, and been translated into over twenty-five languages. The virtue is unadorned: A 'Very Short Introduction' contains all you need to know in order to decide if you need to know more. The recipe is a tough call: a 'Very Short Introduction' must necessarily historicise, provide an epistemological guide to the subject, analyse its conceptual and ideological issues, and wrap it all up – for now. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/2011/12/oup-short-introductions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poetry of &#8216;a detailed curiosity&#8217;.</title>
		<link>http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/2011/12/wandor-sklarew/</link>
		<comments>http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/2011/12/wandor-sklarew/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 14:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books & Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Notes & Comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poetry & Fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Fortnightly Review of Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alan Wall]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/?p=5736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alan Wall: Although radically different books, both Michelene Wandor’s writing and Myra Sklarew’s exhibit a detailed curiosity regarding the minutiae of existence, whether itemising seventeenth-century trade or arachnid encounters. The threads that tie dissimilarities together, whether gossamer or memories of Lithuania, hold the poems together with an alert gracefulness. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/2011/12/wandor-sklarew/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Private Eye at 50&#8242;, surrounded by elderly gents in greatcoats.</title>
		<link>http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/2011/11/private-eye-at-50-surrounded-by-elderly-gents-in-greatcoats/</link>
		<comments>http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/2011/11/private-eye-at-50-surrounded-by-elderly-gents-in-greatcoats/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 11:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books & Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Notes & Comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michelene Wandor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/?p=5607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michelene Wandor: This laid-back exhibition of images from its first fifty years, nestles in two interconnecting rooms at the V &#038; A, conveniently on the route to the wonderful café. Lining one high wall are covers, each of which catches a chilling moment in recent political history. There is a young Tony Blair, dark hair waving over his head, visiting an elderly person in hospital. Blair has a huge grin, reassuring the patient that ‘there’ll be a spin-doctor along in a minute’.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/2011/11/private-eye-at-50-surrounded-by-elderly-gents-in-greatcoats/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coleridge as a poet.</title>
		<link>http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/2011/10/coleridge-as-a-poet/</link>
		<comments>http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/2011/10/coleridge-as-a-poet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 15:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books & Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Notes & Comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poetry & Fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Principal Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reference Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Fortnightly Review of Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/?p=5242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Edward Dowden: Coleridge broke with tradition in the vulgar sense of the word; he broke with tradition in theology, philosophy, politics; yet he did so in a spirit more truly loyal to the past than was the common orthodoxy in theology or philosophy, or the common Toryism in politics.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/2011/10/coleridge-as-a-poet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Historicism and the great beast.</title>
		<link>http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/2011/06/historicism/</link>
		<comments>http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/2011/06/historicism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 08:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Notes & Comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics & Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Principal Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony O'Hear]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/?p=4268</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anthony O'Hear: We should consider whether the extreme unpredictability of the crowds we are seeing to-day in quite a number of places (including even London, as it happens) is not just an extreme illustration of what is actually always the case. Beneath its apparently smooth surface and underpinning the leaders who appear to shape it, human history is built on shifting sands, on countless inherently unstable actions and decisions of millions of individual people.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/2011/06/historicism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Wedding: Good, old-fashioned Royal Family (production) values.</title>
		<link>http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/2011/05/%c2%b7-good-old-fashioned-royal-family-production-values/</link>
		<comments>http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/2011/05/%c2%b7-good-old-fashioned-royal-family-production-values/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2011 00:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chronicle & Notices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dance & Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Notes & Comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics & Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michelene Wandor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/?p=3708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michelene Wandor: On Friday, April 29, 2011, our couple are friends. They have lived together – as one royal biographer said, without mentioning the word ‘sex’:  ‘This is a woman who knows exactly what to do.’ And yet, a guest agony aunt on TV, asked for her advice to the bride said: ‘Have a son quickly, and don’t take any lovers.’ Plus ca change?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/2011/05/%c2%b7-good-old-fashioned-royal-family-production-values/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prince Andrew or President Adams?</title>
		<link>http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/2011/03/prince-andrew-or-president-adams/</link>
		<comments>http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/2011/03/prince-andrew-or-president-adams/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 23:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Notes & Comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Principal Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony O'Hear]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/?p=3370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anthony O'Hear: Rulers and public figures will always be open to the very real temptations and to the flattery which they bring, whatever political system we have. The remedy is not improved regulation or a new political system, but rather to convince public figures that – contrary to Machiavellian pragmatism and the pleasures of swanning on the boats of oligarchs and consorting with tyrants – they remain subject to the natural law of God and the common decencies of mankind.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/2011/03/prince-andrew-or-president-adams/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: fortnightlyreview.co.uk @ 2012-02-06 20:58:41 -->
