Skip to content

Surprises from the Annals of Downplayed Incidents: Detroit.

By ROCHELLE RILEY [Detroit Free Press, 23 June 2010] – Otis Mathis should have resigned [his position as president of the Detroit public school board] when it was discovered that he was functionally illiterate. Murray should resign for actually saying out loud that fondling yourself in a business meeting could be anything but objectionable.

But more important, Detroiters have got to stop mistaking these types of sad men for leaders, stop giving our children the idea that these men represent what they should be.

If we want Detroit to be better, then its leadership must be better. That can’t happen if the conversation is about what you can get away with and not what we allow children to see and hear.

The board is trying to downplay the incident, claiming that it shouldn’t affect whether the board — or the mayor — will be in charge of schools. Continue reading “Surprises from the Annals of Downplayed Incidents: Detroit.” »

Google BookmarksGoogle GmailPrintPrintFriendlyYahoo MailTwitter

The complicated life of the rejected scholar.

By STEPHEN MOSS [Guardian] – Doubts about the authenticity of the Dickens-Dostoevsky meeting spread, retractions were made, the Dickensian had egg on its face. But only recently did the full story of the deception emerge when Eric Naiman, a professor in the department of Slavic Languages and Literatures at the University of California, Berkeley, wrote an immensely detailed six-page article in the TLS (“three days’ work”, says Harvey dismissively when I praise Naiman for his industry) establishing Harvey’s academic avatars – not just Stephanie Harvey, but Graham Headley, Trevor McGovern, John Schellenberger, Leo Bellingham (author of Oxford: The Novel), Michael Lindsay and Ludovico Parra. Naiman traced the way in which, over the past 30 years, this group had been commenting on one another’s work in scholarly journals and little magazines, sometimes praising one ano ther but occasionally finding fault too. “How comforting,” Naiman commented drily, “to construct a community of scholars who can analyse, supplement and occasionally even ruthlessly criticise each other’s work.”

AD Harvey doesn’t deny he is the creator of that community… Continue reading “The complicated life of the rejected scholar.” »

Google BookmarksGoogle GmailPrintPrintFriendlyYahoo MailTwitter

Reefer madness.

By SAMUEL T. WILKINSON [Wall Street Journal] – Those not familiar with epidemiological causation may wonder how cannabis could “cause” schizophrenia if so many people who smoke marijuana or hashish don’t develop the disease. As an example, medical researchers have known for several decades that smoking causes lung cancer, yet over 80% of smokers do not develop lung cancer. Continue reading “Reefer madness.” »

Google BookmarksGoogle GmailPrintPrintFriendlyYahoo MailTwitter

The inside of the open mind.


A MIDDLE-AGED Reserve Ensign once had the unwonted honor of sitting at the same table with an editor of the New Republic and remarked of that sprightly organ, “The trouble is you represent an irresponsible openmindedness.” It was a shock to find the observation accepted as an unqualified compliment. The irresponsible, which meant a good deal to the Ensign meant almost nothing to the editor. At the word openmindedness he beamed like a child. The seafarer had had the bad luck not to be understood and the good luck of blundering upon the sweetest of words to a modern editor’s ears. In idolizing openmindedness of whatever sort the editors merely echo the times. All young people regard openmindedness as axiomatically desirable, like health or physical cleanliness. The mind cannot be too much open or too constantly. Every wind of the Time Spirit must blow in lustily. The door of the mind must never be closed lest some worthy idea be excluded. In the words of the apostle to the Gentiles we are to “prove all things,” at least for the half minute or so between their entering and quitting our hospitably open minds. Continue reading “The inside of the open mind.” »

Google BookmarksGoogle GmailPrintPrintFriendlyYahoo MailTwitter

Quick. Define ‘quadratic equation’.

By KENNETH MINOGUE, who died Friday – An ideological movement is a collection of people many of whom could hardly bake a cake, fix a car, sustain a friendship or a marriage, or even do a quadratic equation, yet they believe they know how to rule the world. Continue reading “Quick. Define ‘quadratic equation’.” »

Google BookmarksGoogle GmailPrintPrintFriendlyYahoo MailTwitter

The era of the nomadic, global curator god.

By PAUL O’NEILL and MICK WILSON [Institute of Contemporary Arts] – Curating – a cultural practice once associated primarily with the care and selection of works for display, usually in the context of a gallery or museum – emerged in the late 1960s as a creative, semi-autonomous and individually-authored form of mediation (and production). By the time Harald Szeemann curated Documenta 5: Questioning Reality, Pictorial Worlds Today (1972), the position of the individual curator had already opened up to wider international debate. This debate was accompanied by a shift of emphasis in the criticism of art: away from the primary critique of the artwork as an autonomous object of study; towards a mode of curatorial criticism in which the curator becomes a central subject of critique. The critical response to Documenta 5, for example, focused on Szeemann’s alleged over-emphasis of his own curatorial concept rather than on consideration of the artworks in the exhibition. Continue reading “The era of the nomadic, global curator god.” »

Google BookmarksGoogle GmailPrintPrintFriendlyYahoo MailTwitter

How Hollywood loved Hitler.

By DAVID MIKICS [Tablet] – Adolf Hitler loved American movies. Every night at about 9:00, after the Führer had tired out his listeners with his hours-long monologues, he would lead his dinner guests to his private screening room. The lights would go down, and Hitler would fall silent, probably for the first time that day. He laughed heartily at his favorites Laurel and Hardy and Mickey Mouse, and he adored Greta Garbo: Camille brought tears to the Führer’s eyes. Tarzan, on the other hand, he thought was silly. Continue reading “How Hollywood loved Hitler.” »

Google BookmarksGoogle GmailPrintPrintFriendlyYahoo MailTwitter

‘Culture is now the counterculture.’

By LEON WIESELTIER [From a commencement address, via The New Republic] – Our glittering age of technologism is also a glittering age of scientism. Scientism is not the same thing as science. Science is a blessing, but scientism is a curse. Science, I mean what practicing scientists actually do, is acutely and admirably aware of its limits, and humbly admits to the provisional character of its conclusions; but scientism is dogmatic, and peddles certainties. It is always at the ready with the solution to every problem, because it believes that the solution to every problem is a scientific one, and so it gives scientific answers to non-scientific questions. But even the question of the place of science in human existence is not a scientific question. It is a philosophical, which is to say, a humanistic, [one]. Continue reading “‘Culture is now the counterculture.’” »

Google BookmarksGoogle GmailPrintPrintFriendlyYahoo MailTwitter

In Harvard’s cloud: anti-intellectual moments and unspeakable ideas.

By JENNIFER LEVITZ and DOUGLAS BELKIN [Wall Street Journal] – The humanities division at Harvard University, for centuries a standard-bearer of American letters, is attracting fewer undergraduates amid concerns about the degree’s value in a rapidly changing job market.

A university report being released Thursday suggests the division aggressively market itself to freshmen and sophomores, create a broader interdisciplinary framework to retain students and build an internship network to establish the value of the degree in the workforce.  Continue reading “In Harvard’s cloud: anti-intellectual moments and unspeakable ideas.” »

Google BookmarksGoogle GmailPrintPrintFriendlyYahoo MailTwitter

The pleasure of games on boards.

By ROBERT FLORENCE [New Statesman] – In Umberto Eco’s brilliant Foucault’s Pendulum, we watch as characters play with global conspiracy theory and occultism as a satirical, intellectual game. This game leads the characters down a dark path, but we understand completely why that path is worth following. Games are important. They are important when we’re children, and then we forget how important they are for a while as we chase adult pleasures. Then we recognise that those too were games, of a sort, and having won and lost and won and lost we return to more obvious and literal games. Ones we can play on our TVs and place on our tables. Ones that hurt less when we fail. Continue reading “The pleasure of games on boards.” »

Google BookmarksGoogle GmailPrintPrintFriendlyYahoo MailTwitter

‘The Victorians were indeed substantially cleverer than modern populations’.

By MICHAEL WOODLEY [Intelligence] – The Victorian era was marked by an explosion of innovation and genius, per capita rates of which appear to have declined subsequently. The presence of dysgenic fertility for IQ amongst Western nations, starting in the 19th century, suggests that these trends might be related to declining IQ. This is because high-IQ people are more productive and more creative. Continue reading “‘The Victorians were indeed substantially cleverer than modern populations’.” »

Google BookmarksGoogle GmailPrintPrintFriendlyYahoo MailTwitter

It’s Europe Day – and night.

Today is designated ‘Europe Day’ in the EU. – Ed.

By NIALL FERGUSON [Il Sole 24 Ore via PressEurop] – Europe has to be judged in economic terms, since its own terms have always been economic. And how did it do? In the 1950s the economy of integrated Europe grew at 4 per cent. In the 1960s, it was about the same. In the 1970s, growth was 2.8 per cent; in the 1980s, it slid to 2.1 per cent; in the 1990s, it was only 1.7 per cent: and so on, down to zero. Continue reading “It’s Europe Day – and night.” »

Google BookmarksGoogle GmailPrintPrintFriendlyYahoo MailTwitter

Camus, the Mediterranean man…

By ARTHUR GOLDHAMMER [in the translator's note from the new English edition of Algerian Chronicles] – After listening to Camus lecture, the writer Julien Green described him in terms that one might apply to a secular saint: “There is in this man a probity so obvious that it inspires almost immediate respect in me. To put it plainly, he is not like the others.” This quality of authenticity is unmistakable throughout the pieces collected here. Continue reading “Camus, the Mediterranean man…” »

Google BookmarksGoogle GmailPrintPrintFriendlyYahoo MailTwitter

‘For more than 30 years, every French government has lost every election.’

By JOHN LAUGHLAND [The Spectator] – The French political system is terminally sick…For more than 30 years, every French government has lost every election. With a single exception, you have to be over 50 today to have voted in the last election, in 1978, when the incumbent majority held on to power: Nicolas Sarkozy managed to get a conservative majority re-elected in 2007 only because he profiled himself, dishonestly, as a new broom and as a rebel against the roi fainéant, his former mentor Jacques Chirac. Add to this the fact that in 2005 the referendum on the European constitution produced a ‘no ‘vote — that is, a disavowal of the entire political establishment — and you are confronted with a bitter reality: the French electorate hates its politicians and takes every chance to vote against them. Continue reading “‘For more than 30 years, every French government has lost every election.’” »

Google BookmarksGoogle GmailPrintPrintFriendlyYahoo MailTwitter

Engineered ‘equality’ and the ‘menace to liberty’.

From an interview with DONALD KAGAN [Wall Street Journal] – “The essence of liberty, which is at the root of a liberal education, is that meaningful freedom means that you have choices to make,” [Donald] Kagan says. “At the university, there must be intellectual variety. If you don’t have [that], it’s not only that you are deprived of knowing some of the things you might know. It’s that you are deprived of testing the things that you do know or do think you know or believe in, so that your knowledge is superficial.” Continue reading “Engineered ‘equality’ and the ‘menace to liberty’.” »

Google BookmarksGoogle GmailPrintPrintFriendlyYahoo MailTwitter