Skip to content

Atheists to Richard Dawkins: go to hell.

By MARTIN ROBBINS [New Statesman] – In the olden days, at the turn of the century, it was hard to come by vaguely-racist bigotry in our day-to-day lives. Back then you had to go and visit your grandparents a few times a year, and sit there quietly while they talked about the coloured folk in the corner shop and how you couldn’t walk to Sainsbury’s to buy your Daily Mail without being robbed by a gang of Asians. Then somebody built Twitter, and then Richard Dawkins joined. 

@RichardDawkins is the increasingly erratic comedy creation of a bored Oxford Professor called Richard Dawkins. One of the best science writers of the last few decades, Dawkins has succeeding in crafting an online character that ironically parodies the more militant tendencies in capital-A Atheism, serving as a useful reminder for all of us to be more nuanced and tolerant.

Or at least that’s the kind interpretation. The alternative is that one of Britain’s leading intellectuals really has degenerated to the point where he believes that the following is an intelligent argument:

All the world’s Muslims have fewer Nobel Prizes than Trinity College, Cambridge. They did great things in the Middle Ages, though.

Unsurprisingly, a lot of people have found this offensive…

Dawkins remains a powerful force in atheism for the time being. Increasingly though, his public output resembles that of a man desperately grasping for attention and relevance in a maturing community. A community more interested in the positive expression of humanism and secularism than in watching a rich and privileged man punching down at people denied his opportunities in life. That, ultimately, is the tragedy of Richard Dawkins – a man who knows the definition of everything and the meaning of nothing.

Continued at the New Statesman | More Chronicle & Notices.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

3 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
HearSay
HearSay
10 years ago

That was a bit below-the-belt! Richard Dawkins is probably well aware that being a ‘comic’ is not his forte, and I see no evidence of him purporting to major in that category. In general respect, Richard’s academic contributions more than out-weigh the ‘frolicking teasers’ he feeds to trolls. I’m sure he would immediately agree with me that the master of scientific-wit is no other than his friend Douglas Adams!(rip & what a diamond eh!)

Rationalobservations
Rationalobservations
10 years ago

Dawkins speaks only for Dawkins. He is no substitute for the wit and wisdom of the sadly now dead and gone Chris Hitchins, but all those who poked their heads above the parapet of myth and mystery have done a great service to mankind in demonstrating to the ever more rapidly growing legion of non-believers that they are not alone in rationalism and that they too can be free to speak out against lies and ancient taboos based only upon legends and myths.

boagie
boagie
10 years ago

Basking in reflected light is not all bad as you are presently finding, some believers even say you can get a tan from reflected light sources—-lol!!

3
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x