Skip to content

‘This girl must go!’ shouted Martin Heidegger’s wife.

By ROBERT EAGLESTONE [Times Higher Education] – I am interested in the philosophy of Heidegger, in the thought of Arendt. To study Shakespeare means to be interested in his plays and poems, not him: what we learn about Darwin – about his interest in dogs and dog breeding, for example – is key to explaining the genesis and methodology of On the Origin of Species.

This is not to say that someone’s life has nothing to do with his or her work, but that these links are complex, often obscure, and need to be treated with care to avoid simply becoming post facto justifications or, worse, just gossip. This is, sadly, where Daniel Maier-Katkin’s Stranger from Abroad: Hannah Arendt, Martin Heidegger, Friendship and Forgiveness fails, despite its best efforts and intentions: it is a book of academic celebrity gossip.

In 1925, when Arendt was a student, she and her professor, Heidegger, began a love affair. This is now almost mythologised and is the subject of books, plays and a novel. It could easily be turned into a Hollywood movie (“Decadent Germany – before the storm! She was the brilliant Jewish student! He was the famous professor, soon to join the Nazis! Their passion was forbidden! And destructive!”).

This affair is often used to attack Arendt, who is still an astonishingly controversial figure, as if she remained somehow for ever in hock to Heidegger. In this more sympathetic book, the affair is taken to be the fulcrum of Arendt’s whole life. However, it seems to me that the issue of importance here is not this “celebrity gossip” (“‘This Girl Must Go!’ says Elfride Heidegger”) but the intellectual impact of Heidegger’s work on her own.

His contemporary reputation was as the “hidden king of thinking”. The British philosopher Gilbert Ryle, no friend of European philosophy, reviewed Heidegger’s major work Being and Time and suggested that he “shows himself to be a thinker of real importance by the immense subtlety and searchingness of his examination of consciousness, by the boldness and originality of his methods and conclusions and by the unflagging energies with which he tries to think behind the stock categories of orthodox philosophy and psychology”.

Continued at Times Higher Education | More Chronicle & Notices.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x